Opening & Keynote @ g0v summit 2014
編輯歷史
| 時間 | 作者 | 版本 |
|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-07 18:31 – 18:31 | r0 – r1 | |
顯示 diff+ Opening & Keynote @ g0v summit 2014
+ more info: g0v summit 2014 hackfoldr
+
+ 現場直播網址 (live url)
+ 錄影紀錄網址 (video url)
+ 照片紀錄網址 (photos url)
+ *（徘徊）這場是不是沒有錄影紀錄呢？
+ *中研院有錄影，之後會上傳～
+
+ ↓文字轉播、線上討論↓
+
+ *Opening
+ slides url
+
+
+
+ *Keynote
+ slides url
+
+ 介紹G0V的由來
+ 台灣社會發生了很多事，因此有人開始思考用科技改變一些事。
+ 我們從數位世代的角度，如何從零去思考，政府怎樣跟人民互動。
+ 政治獻金的數位化，醫療系統看板，食安事件豬油的統計，議員投票指南（平時議員做了些什麼事），在３１８時也有很多人跨出了虛擬的世界，到現場直播去做一些事。
+ 這兩年來，我們達到目標嗎？這是我們的目標嗎？事實上非常非常的少，因此我們今天在這邊，希望在這裡跟大家學習，分享，交流。
+ 交流第一步是先認識彼此，先找你旁邊一位不認識的朋友打招呼。。。
+ （看來大家欲罷不能。。。）
+ 其實今天我們所有四個議程都會在線上直播，如果你要分享，請用#g0vsummit這個hashtag
+ (接著介紹今天規定，議程及閃電秀，明日的自由提案示範，特別感謝）
+
+ David Eaves
+
+ history of opening up the government
+ the first one is 1766 Sweden
+ 1966 US
+ 1970 Norway
+ 1974 US
+ Access Information Act
+
+ why?
+ reason one
+ 1974 Nixson
+ progressive coalitions/political trust crisis
+ Because Richard Nixon who broke political trust and caused everyone to believe we should not have this happen ever again.
+
+ reason two
+ widespread use of photocopiers
+ "FOIA is predicated on the existence of copiers"
+
+ there's some form of public demand of change that combines with some form of re-oganization that combines with technology that can promote the changes we need(?)
+
+ how do we increase the size of this sweet spot (Techonology + Organization + Public Demand)
+ for me to increase the organization is more important
+
+ Environmental group say greenpeace
+ a very clear notion of how to implement a big change
+ what we want to change -> analysis -> theory -> develop campaign -> implement -> big change happens
+ (big chart of greenpeace campaign)
+ in gov space there are times that we get angry and know what we want to change and skip the analysis and go straight to the implementation
+ what you actually want to change? what is your goal? change gov? make a good public site for people to use easily? have fun? these are all valid goals
+ Beware of shifting goals. the real risk of me [on making the Open Data website] is to shift the goal from changing the gov to embarrassing the gov. this is also a valid goal because this would increase public demand(?), but you have to know what you are doing
+
+ Big Tent
+ you (people in this room) are a big tent coalition
+ when you have a big tent you have to acknowledge different motivations
+ and the big risks is to start judging people because they don't have to same goal as you
+ it is *great* that you have a diversity of goals
+ the real question is how do we make each of us achieve what each of us what
+ patriot - careerist - the evangelist
+ they actually have different goals and it is easy for them see only their differences and to forget what they are trying to accomplish together
+
+ have one community vs infect our communities
+ a single conf is important but i think it is not as important as it used to be
+ so your job is not only to go to this conference but also to *infest* all other communities
+ if you're a journalist go infect your colleagues
+
+ Power
+ what happens when we use that power to the effective and win?
+ Utopia!
+ Loggers （伐木業者） + Environmentalists + Open Data (map)
+ Chicago 選區劃分
+ I would argue that the district is a complete success
+ the only way you can do this is to have public consensus data and you can draw the district so that the parties can convientent win (i.e. gerrymandering)（用選區作弊）
+ The data IS political. (資料本身就是政治性的) Whether you are an engineer, it is a deeply political things you are doing.
+ Long form census. If I am a politician and I know that people are going to make big decisions using data, I would try to let people know what I want them to know
+ You in this room has a very special ability to know the implications of all this and it is your responsibilities to use this knowledge to public service and to let people know about this.
+ 問題：我是老媒體人，如何建立跨世代的和解？
+ *acknowledge differences
|
||